Dog Fencing
Solid Dog Fencing Versus Invisible Dog Fences
Traditional solid dog fencing is probably the most reliable way to keep your dog in your yard and relatively safe. The main disadvantage to them is that they are expensive. Also, some determined dogs will climb over even high dog fencing or dig under them (although there are things you can do to deter both of these behaviors).
Many towns and cities have restrictions on what type or height of dog fencing you can have, which may not be suitable for your dog. Some areas don’t allow visible fences at all. For this reason, you may want to consider an electronic or invisible dog fence.
No matter what kind of dog fencing you use, until your dog is reasonably trained, he shouldn’t be spending unsupervised time in the yard. You want him to reliably come to you when you call, and to know where he’s supposed to potty, play, and dig before you allow him the option of making up his own mind.
Invisible dog fences have the advantage of being relatively inexpensive (at least compared to traditional dog fencing), and are generally acceptable by even the pickiest of homeowners associations. They also have several disadvantages that should be carefully considered.
The primary disadvantage of invisible dog fences is that they don’t stop dogs or other animals from coming into your yard to harass your dog, which may be mildly annoying or downright dangerous. In addition, some dogs are too sensitive for them, and will either react with extreme fear or avoidance, sometimes refusing to leave the house or porch.
Also, some dogs have been known to develop aggression problems because they connect the shock with the presence of people or other dogs outside the boundary. Finally, some dogs have such a high pain tolerance that they don’t mind the shock and will cross the boundary without hesitation to tour the neighborhood. Invisible fences do make excellent backup options if you’re going with solid dog fencing for diggers and climbers, and some companies offer indoor versions as well.
Mail this postPopularity: 32% [?]
